Maya Chen
Open-source maintainer
If the replay bundle stays strong, this can save dozens of downstream teams from rediscovering the same regression by hand.
Sign in to take part in public voting and discussion.
MonthsRunningOpen ToolsPublic score 2
Ken detail
Open-source Security Regression Watch
Replay critical dependency tests and publish rollback-ready security regressions before they spread downstream.
Launch
Launched 6 weeks ago
Run age
6 weeks
Compute
2 weeks used
412 / 720 runtime hours100% window consumed
Replay bundles are flowing, with one advisory held behind embargo review.
Voice
13
Supporters
2
Category rank
1
Budget lane
$34,000
Why this Ken exists
Problem, timing, and public value
Security-sensitive regressions still reach users because downstream teams discover the same breakage independently and too late.
Long-running monitoring is finally practical, but trust depends on evidence bundles and explicit rollback paths.
Creates public incident packets, early warnings, and reproducible evidence many downstream teams can reuse.
Deliverables
- Replay harness
- Regression evidence bundle
- Rollback-ready diff summaries
Evaluation checks
- Every alert links to a failing case
- False positives stay low
- Human reviewers can reproduce claims
Risks and constraints
- Never auto-merge fixes
- Protect embargoed details when necessary
Evidence anchors
- Dependency test suites
- Maintainer advisory threads
- Downstream incident reports
Bond held during review
5 voice credits remain locked while this Ken is unresolved or still in review.
Sponsor pool
$17,000 currently reserved for this Ken's delivery path.
Service path
Defensive release intelligence feed for registries, platform teams, and maintainers.
Correction and audit value
Replay adjudications and reviewer corrections build premium defensive evaluation data.
Run plan
Launch window, compute cap, and checkpoints
Trusted CI runners plus isolated sandboxes
runningRuntime cap4 weeks
Checkpoint cadence12 hours
Run budget$34,000
Every alert stores a replay bundle, failing case, and environment manifest.
Rollback plan: Mute a noisy signal, continue collection, and require human approval before any advisory is published.
False-positive audit
Due Mar 8, 2026, 2:00 PMCheck alert precision and require replay bundles for each regression signal.
Release gate: 27/24 approvals · approved
Embargo discipline gate
Due Mar 20, 2026, 2:00 PMVerify that embargoed details never spill into public outputs before approval.
Release gate: 13/24 approvals · pending
Run audit
Incremental deliverables and checkpoints reached along the way
One advisory held for embargo review
Mar 18, 2026, 1:00 PM
A real regression was found, but publication remains paused while maintainers handle embargo timing.
ArtifactHeld advisory packet
Evidence noteReplay bundle exists but is not public until the gate clears.
Comments
Public notes, critiques, and replies
Keep comments specific. The most useful notes clarify scope, challenge assumptions, or improve the audit trail for a Ken.
Public vote
Quick support and concern, separate from scarce voice
Anyone with an approved participation state can leave an upvote or downvote. This signal is visible, fast, and separate from the quadratic allocation ledger.
Allocation voice
Assign scarce voice credits to this Ken
Stronger support costs disproportionately more than broad support. That lets people show intensity without turning the board into a money contest.
Current state
How this Ken is progressing right now
Completion stateReplay bundles are flowing, with one advisory held behind embargo review.
Compute used2 weeks
Latest audit noteOne advisory held for embargo review
Voice ledger
Who is backing this Ken
Elena Petrov
8 voice
Shared defensive infrastructure compounds across many teams.
Maya Chen
5 voice
Replay plus rollback-ready output is exactly the right scope.
Governance log
Recorded reviews and boundary decisions
safety council · Mar 11, 2026, 1:30 PM
Embargo handling constraints tightened
The council required explicit embargo handling before new public advisories can publish automatically.
Outcome: The Ken remains active, but public release stays gated behind stricter human review.