Priya Singh
Operations lead
The partial result is still valuable. The pilot proved there is time-saving utility, but the current guardrails are not yet strong enough for anything broader.
Sign in to take part in public voting and discussion.
MonthsShippedScience and HealthPublic score 1
Ken detail
Clinic Follow-up Question Drafter
Generate concise, source-backed follow-up question sets for community clinics after complex specialist notes arrive.
Launch
Launched 6 weeks ago
Run age
7 weeks
Compute
3 days used
72 / 72 runtime hours100% window consumed
The pilot shipped narrow value, but expansion was stopped pending more conservative controls.
Voice
2
Supporters
1
Category rank
2
Budget lane
$6,200
Why this Ken exists
Problem, timing, and public value
Community clinics often receive dense specialist documents without enough staff time to turn them into clear follow-up actions.
A carefully supervised drafting workflow can save clinician time if it stays narrow, auditable, and easy to discard when uncertain.
Improves continuity of care in under-resourced settings without claiming diagnosis or replacing medical judgment.
Deliverables
- Question set draft
- Source-linked note summary
- Escalation flags for clinician review
Evaluation checks
- Clinicians can audit each question
- Unsafe suggestions are rare
- Edits feed back into quality review
Risks and constraints
- No diagnostic claims
- Human sign-off required before use
Evidence anchors
- Specialist note templates
- Clinic follow-up protocols
- Quality-improvement reviews
Bond held during review
1 voice credits remain locked while this Ken is unresolved or still in review.
Sponsor pool
$2,200 currently reserved for this Ken's delivery path.
Service path
Care-team drafting support for community clinics with mandatory clinician sign-off.
Correction and audit value
Accepted and rejected follow-up prompts sharpen narrow, safe medical drafting workflows.
Run plan
Launch window, compute cap, and checkpoints
Retrieval-augmented drafting with clinician review queue
completeRuntime cap3 days
Checkpoint cadence12 hours
Run budget$6,200
Drafted questions are stored with note excerpts, approvals, and rejection reasons.
Rollback plan: Disable clinic-facing drafting and retain the audit trail if clinicians see unsafe drift.
Clinician pilot review
Due Mar 4, 2026, 3:00 PMMeasure whether suggested question sets are useful, safe, and easy to dismiss when wrong.
Release gate: 10/8 approvals · approved
Run audit
Incremental deliverables and checkpoints reached along the way
Pilot shipped with limited scope
Mar 5, 2026, 5:30 PM
Clinicians found the drafting useful for note triage, but broader automation was intentionally deferred after the compute window ended.
ArtifactPilot retrospective
Evidence noteAccepted and rejected outputs remain available for audit.
Comments
Public notes, critiques, and replies
Keep comments specific. The most useful notes clarify scope, challenge assumptions, or improve the audit trail for a Ken.
Public vote
Quick support and concern, separate from scarce voice
Anyone with an approved participation state can leave an upvote or downvote. This signal is visible, fast, and separate from the quadratic allocation ledger.
Allocation voice
Assign scarce voice credits to this Ken
Stronger support costs disproportionately more than broad support. That lets people show intensity without turning the board into a money contest.
Current state
How this Ken is progressing right now
Completion stateThe pilot shipped narrow value, but expansion was stopped pending more conservative controls.
Compute used3 days
Latest audit notePilot shipped with limited scope
Voice ledger
Who is backing this Ken
Priya Singh
2 voice
Worth running narrowly with strong clinician oversight.
Governance log
Recorded reviews and boundary decisions
safety council · Mar 5, 2026, 5:00 PM
Pilot closed after compute limit with partial success
The council accepted a narrow shipped state because clinicians found the question drafts helpful, but broader automation remains premature.
Outcome: The pilot artifacts stay public while wider expansion returns to review.